Technical assessment · AI companies
AI Technical Due Diligence.
A practical assessment of whether an AI product, its data, architecture, team and deployment claims can survive real operating conditions.

01 · Decision
Does the technical story hold together?
The assessment asks whether the product solves a real workflow, whether the data position is defensible, whether the architecture and team can support the claims, and what remains unproven before a decision.
Product reality
What exists beyond the demo, and which workflow is actually supported?
Data and models
Are data rights, feedback loops, model choices and RAG quality clear?
Architecture
Can integrations, security, governance and observability survive deployment?
Team execution
Can the team make trade-offs, expose technical debt and ship the next boundary?
02 · Assessment dimensions
Questions, not implied outcomes.
Deployment readiness
What changes when the product enters a customer's real environment?
Economics and observability
What is measured, what is expensive, and what can the team see in operation?
Open questions
Which product, data, security or delivery statements still need evidence?
Examples here are assessment questions. They are not claims about a completed review, a portfolio or a transaction.
03 · Process
A bounded technical review.
- Management and technical interviews
- Architecture and repository review when permitted
- Product material and deployment-context review
- Risk register with red flags and open questions
- Written technical memo and decision briefing

04 · Deliverables
A written view of what is known, open and risky.
Review summary
What was looked at, what was supplied, and which questions remain open.
Technical memo
Architecture, data, deployment, observability, team execution and hidden technical debt.
Decision briefing
Red flags, open questions, limitations and the next technical checks to run.
05 · Boundaries
Technical assessment, not investment advice.
This work is a technical assessment of product, data, architecture, deployment and team claims. It is not legal, financial, accounting or regulated investment advice, and it does not allocate capital, recommend a transaction or guarantee an outcome.